<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Financial Crisis Aftermath</title>
	<atom:link href="http://financialcrisisaftermath.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://financialcrisisaftermath.com</link>
	<description>Adapting to the New Normal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:12:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lessons from Argentina&#8217;s Hyperinflation by willy</title>
		<link>http://financialcrisisaftermath.com/the-instability-scenario/lessons-from-argentinas-hyperinflation/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>willy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialcrisisaftermath.com/?p=166#comment-145</guid>
		<description>&quot;The get it&quot;  



Raise rates and idefault on the onerous interest on debt or monetize that debt thereby instigating hyperinflation. Default or Monetize...is their a third option for the US? Seriously, perhaps you could illuminate the alternatives to the Argentinian path?  The cake seems baked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The get it&#8221;  </p>
<p>Raise rates and idefault on the onerous interest on debt or monetize that debt thereby instigating hyperinflation. Default or Monetize&#8230;is their a third option for the US? Seriously, perhaps you could illuminate the alternatives to the Argentinian path?  The cake seems baked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lessons from Argentina&#8217;s Hyperinflation by Deft</title>
		<link>http://financialcrisisaftermath.com/the-instability-scenario/lessons-from-argentinas-hyperinflation/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Deft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialcrisisaftermath.com/?p=166#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Lol, yeah the Fed &quot;gets it&quot;.  They&#039;ve produced every financial bubble we&#039;ve had and they&#039;re owned by Wall Street banks.  The world wouldn&#039;t be in this situation at all if not for the Fed and their cursed fiat money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, yeah the Fed &#8220;gets it&#8221;.  They&#8217;ve produced every financial bubble we&#8217;ve had and they&#8217;re owned by Wall Street banks.  The world wouldn&#8217;t be in this situation at all if not for the Fed and their cursed fiat money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Rick Davis</title>
		<link>http://financialcrisisaftermath.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialcrisisaftermath.com/?page_id=2#comment-138</guid>
		<description>On July 30th the Bureau of Economic Analysis (&#039;BEA&#039;) released its &quot;advance&quot; estimate of the annualized growth rate of the U.S. Gross Domestic Product (&#039;GDP&#039;) during the 2nd quarter of 2010. Per their report, during the quarter the GDP grew at an annualized rate of 2.4%, down from 3.7% in the 1st quarter of 2010. Several points from the report merit comment:

? Readers familiar with GDP reports will be more surprised by the reported 1st quarter growth as by the new 2nd quarter number (which had been leaked by Mr. Bernanke last week), since only last month the Q1 of 2010 was supposedly growing at a 2.7% rate. Why did the Q1 number suddenly get altered upward by 1%? The BEA quietly revised the 1st quarter inventory adjustment up to a level that represents a 2.64% component within the revised 3.7% figure, with 1st quarter &quot;real final sales of domestic product&quot; now reported to be growing at a modestly improved 1.06% annualized clip, compared to the 0.9% number reported last month. In short, factories were piling on inventory at a substantially higher rate than previously thought, while the &quot;real final sales&quot; remained anemic.

? The 2.4% figure will garner all of the headlines, but the more important &quot;real final sales of domestic product&quot; continues to be weak, growing at a reported 1.3% annualized rate. The real cause for concern is that the reported inventory adjustments dropped from a 2.64% component in the revised 1st quarter to a 1.05% component during the 2nd quarter. If factories have begun to realize that end user demand remains anemic, the inventory adjustments could well go negative soon, pulling the reported total GDP down with it.

http://www.consumerindexes.com/commentary_2010_dailygrowthindexvsgdp.png

? The BEA revised much more than the first quarter of 2010. They revised down 2009, 2008 and 2007 as well. Apparently the &quot;Great Recession&quot; has been worse than our government has previously reported. And the recovery&#039;s brightest moment, Q4 2009, has been revised down from 5.6% to 5.0%. Similarly Q3 2009 dropped from 2.2% to 1.6%. And so on. The bottom of the recession was shifted back one quarter, with Q4 2008 now reported to have contracted at a -6.8% rate, revised down from the previously reported -5.4% rate. Most quarters of 2007, 2008 and 2009 have been revised down substantially, shifting the recession shown in the chart above back in time. 

? The new GDP report shows that the current gap between the consumer demand that we measure and the BEA&#039;s reported number continues to grow as factories build their inventories in anticipation of a strong recovery. If factories curb their enthusiasm during the third quarter, the BEA&#039;s &quot;advance&quot; estimate for Q3 2010 might be brutal, just 4 days before the U.S. mid-term election.

? We understand that economists want to ultimately get the numbers right, even if it is three years after the fact. We applaud the BEA for their efforts. But we also understand people who are concerned about quiet governmental revisions to history.



Back to the real world: at the Consumer Metrics Institute our Daily Growth Index has dropped to new recent lows, and it is now contracting at a -3.4% rate.

http://www.consumerindexes.com/commentary_2010_dailygrowthindexlast60days.png

This contraction rate puts the trailing &#039;quarter&#039; nearly into the 5th percentile among all quarters since 1947, meaning that only about 1 in 20 quarters officially recorded by the BEA since then has been worse. Our &quot;Contraction Watch&quot; places this movement into the perspective of the 2006 and 2008 contractions:

http://www.consumerindexes.com/commentary_2010_contraction_watch.png

The 2010 contraction is now clearly worse than the &quot;Great Recession&quot; was at the same point in their respective time lines. And we don&#039;t see a bottom forming yet.

At the Consumer Metrics Institute we measure day-by-day changes in the discretionary durable goods transactions of internet shopping consumers. We genuinely believe that the real economy lives where &#039;Main Street&#039; consumers are (figuratively and/or literally) clicking &#039;Add to Shopping Cart&#039;, not where the GDP&#039;s factories slavishly follow the consumer&#039;s lead. The millions of consumers we measure each day respond collectively to what they see going on in their own local economy, with their own family and with their friends. And right now real-world &#039;Main Street&#039; consumers are demonstrating substantial caution.

Our data is available at ConsumerIndexes (dot) com.

Thank you,

Rick Davis
Consumer Metrics Institute</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On July 30th the Bureau of Economic Analysis (&#8216;BEA&#8217;) released its &#8220;advance&#8221; estimate of the annualized growth rate of the U.S. Gross Domestic Product (&#8216;GDP&#8217;) during the 2nd quarter of 2010. Per their report, during the quarter the GDP grew at an annualized rate of 2.4%, down from 3.7% in the 1st quarter of 2010. Several points from the report merit comment:</p>
<p>? Readers familiar with GDP reports will be more surprised by the reported 1st quarter growth as by the new 2nd quarter number (which had been leaked by Mr. Bernanke last week), since only last month the Q1 of 2010 was supposedly growing at a 2.7% rate. Why did the Q1 number suddenly get altered upward by 1%? The BEA quietly revised the 1st quarter inventory adjustment up to a level that represents a 2.64% component within the revised 3.7% figure, with 1st quarter &#8220;real final sales of domestic product&#8221; now reported to be growing at a modestly improved 1.06% annualized clip, compared to the 0.9% number reported last month. In short, factories were piling on inventory at a substantially higher rate than previously thought, while the &#8220;real final sales&#8221; remained anemic.</p>
<p>? The 2.4% figure will garner all of the headlines, but the more important &#8220;real final sales of domestic product&#8221; continues to be weak, growing at a reported 1.3% annualized rate. The real cause for concern is that the reported inventory adjustments dropped from a 2.64% component in the revised 1st quarter to a 1.05% component during the 2nd quarter. If factories have begun to realize that end user demand remains anemic, the inventory adjustments could well go negative soon, pulling the reported total GDP down with it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.consumerindexes.com/commentary_2010_dailygrowthindexvsgdp.png" rel="nofollow">http://www.consumerindexes.com/commentary_2010_dailygrowthindexvsgdp.png</a></p>
<p>? The BEA revised much more than the first quarter of 2010. They revised down 2009, 2008 and 2007 as well. Apparently the &#8220;Great Recession&#8221; has been worse than our government has previously reported. And the recovery&#8217;s brightest moment, Q4 2009, has been revised down from 5.6% to 5.0%. Similarly Q3 2009 dropped from 2.2% to 1.6%. And so on. The bottom of the recession was shifted back one quarter, with Q4 2008 now reported to have contracted at a -6.8% rate, revised down from the previously reported -5.4% rate. Most quarters of 2007, 2008 and 2009 have been revised down substantially, shifting the recession shown in the chart above back in time. </p>
<p>? The new GDP report shows that the current gap between the consumer demand that we measure and the BEA&#8217;s reported number continues to grow as factories build their inventories in anticipation of a strong recovery. If factories curb their enthusiasm during the third quarter, the BEA&#8217;s &#8220;advance&#8221; estimate for Q3 2010 might be brutal, just 4 days before the U.S. mid-term election.</p>
<p>? We understand that economists want to ultimately get the numbers right, even if it is three years after the fact. We applaud the BEA for their efforts. But we also understand people who are concerned about quiet governmental revisions to history.</p>
<p>Back to the real world: at the Consumer Metrics Institute our Daily Growth Index has dropped to new recent lows, and it is now contracting at a -3.4% rate.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.consumerindexes.com/commentary_2010_dailygrowthindexlast60days.png" rel="nofollow">http://www.consumerindexes.com/commentary_2010_dailygrowthindexlast60days.png</a></p>
<p>This contraction rate puts the trailing &#8216;quarter&#8217; nearly into the 5th percentile among all quarters since 1947, meaning that only about 1 in 20 quarters officially recorded by the BEA since then has been worse. Our &#8220;Contraction Watch&#8221; places this movement into the perspective of the 2006 and 2008 contractions:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.consumerindexes.com/commentary_2010_contraction_watch.png" rel="nofollow">http://www.consumerindexes.com/commentary_2010_contraction_watch.png</a></p>
<p>The 2010 contraction is now clearly worse than the &#8220;Great Recession&#8221; was at the same point in their respective time lines. And we don&#8217;t see a bottom forming yet.</p>
<p>At the Consumer Metrics Institute we measure day-by-day changes in the discretionary durable goods transactions of internet shopping consumers. We genuinely believe that the real economy lives where &#8216;Main Street&#8217; consumers are (figuratively and/or literally) clicking &#8216;Add to Shopping Cart&#8217;, not where the GDP&#8217;s factories slavishly follow the consumer&#8217;s lead. The millions of consumers we measure each day respond collectively to what they see going on in their own local economy, with their own family and with their friends. And right now real-world &#8216;Main Street&#8217; consumers are demonstrating substantial caution.</p>
<p>Our data is available at ConsumerIndexes (dot) com.</p>
<p>Thank you,</p>
<p>Rick Davis<br />
Consumer Metrics Institute</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lessons from Argentina&#8217;s Hyperinflation by Myke</title>
		<link>http://financialcrisisaftermath.com/the-instability-scenario/lessons-from-argentinas-hyperinflation/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Myke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialcrisisaftermath.com/?p=166#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the link: http://www.investorsinsight.com/blogs/thoughts_from_the_frontline/archive/2010/03/26/what-does-greece-mean-to-you.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the link: <a href="http://www.investorsinsight.com/blogs/thoughts_from_the_frontline/archive/2010/03/26/what-does-greece-mean-to-you.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.investorsinsight.com/blogs/thoughts_from_the_frontline/archive/2010/03/26/what-does-greece-mean-to-you.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lessons from Argentina&#8217;s Hyperinflation by Larry Muller</title>
		<link>http://financialcrisisaftermath.com/the-instability-scenario/lessons-from-argentinas-hyperinflation/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Muller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 20:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialcrisisaftermath.com/?p=166#comment-132</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m writing a book about fiscal reform in America. I would like to  reprint this article and reference this article in the forward of the book I am writing.  Can you tell me how I may reach John Mauldin to inquire about authorization to do that?

Thank you,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m writing a book about fiscal reform in America. I would like to  reprint this article and reference this article in the forward of the book I am writing.  Can you tell me how I may reach John Mauldin to inquire about authorization to do that?</p>
<p>Thank you,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by vincenzo</title>
		<link>http://financialcrisisaftermath.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>vincenzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialcrisisaftermath.com/?page_id=2#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Hello,

My name is Vincenzo, the C.R. Executive of ForexCharts.net; an expert resource and guide for the forex market.
I would like to collaborate with your site, as I think this could benefit both of our readers in some way.

Is this something you could see discussing?

Best Regards,

Chenzo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>My name is Vincenzo, the C.R. Executive of ForexCharts.net; an expert resource and guide for the forex market.<br />
I would like to collaborate with your site, as I think this could benefit both of our readers in some way.</p>
<p>Is this something you could see discussing?</p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>Chenzo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are Huge Real Estate Defaults Coming in 2010? by Myke</title>
		<link>http://financialcrisisaftermath.com/the-instability-scenario/are-huge-real-estate-defaults-coming-in-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Myke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialcrisisaftermath.com/?p=189#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Hopefully, the President and the Fed are trying to find the least destructive solution and not just enriching their cronies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully, the President and the Fed are trying to find the least destructive solution and not just enriching their cronies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are Huge Real Estate Defaults Coming in 2010? by John</title>
		<link>http://financialcrisisaftermath.com/the-instability-scenario/are-huge-real-estate-defaults-coming-in-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 03:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialcrisisaftermath.com/?p=189#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Is their a responsible solution that does not include widespread suffering and loss?  I agree with most of what you said, I just fear for the future of the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is their a responsible solution that does not include widespread suffering and loss?  I agree with most of what you said, I just fear for the future of the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The FED Must Continue To Buy Its Own Debt by Myke</title>
		<link>http://financialcrisisaftermath.com/the-instability-scenario/the-fed-must-continue-to-buy-its-own-debt/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Myke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialcrisisaftermath.com/?p=183#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Predicting currency changes is for the experts. I&#039;ll try to report what they foresee. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Predicting currency changes is for the experts. I&#8217;ll try to report what they foresee. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The FED Must Continue To Buy Its Own Debt by Publius</title>
		<link>http://financialcrisisaftermath.com/the-instability-scenario/the-fed-must-continue-to-buy-its-own-debt/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Publius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financialcrisisaftermath.com/?p=183#comment-72</guid>
		<description>I have read that the IMF special drawing rights will be the new global ducat.  I am paid in FRN&#039;s though so I do not know how significant a change the IMF money will be.  Will I buy my beer for less than I spent with FRN&#039;s or more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read that the IMF special drawing rights will be the new global ducat.  I am paid in FRN&#8217;s though so I do not know how significant a change the IMF money will be.  Will I buy my beer for less than I spent with FRN&#8217;s or more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

